A personal answer to the question of existence

And was it strange seeing your work drawn by someone else?

A personal answer to the question of existence

Is there an argument for the existence of God? The question of whether there is a conclusive argument for the existence of God has been debated throughout history, with exceedingly intelligent people taking both sides of the dispute. Karl Marx asserted that anyone believing in God must have a mental disorder that caused invalid thinking.

The philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche bluntly said that faith equates to not wanting to know what is true. The voices of these three figures from history along with others are simply now parroted by a new generation of atheists who claim that a belief in God is intellectually unwarranted.

Is this truly the case?

A personal answer to the question of existence

Is belief in God a rationally unacceptable position to hold? Is there a logical and reasonable argument for the existence of God?

Outside of referencing the Bible, can a case for the existence of God be made that refutes the positions of both the old and new atheists and gives sufficient warrant for believing in a Creator?

The answer is, yes, it can. Moreover, in demonstrating the validity of an argument for the existence of God, the case for atheism is shown to be intellectually weak. To make an argument for the existence of God, we must start by asking the right questions. We begin with the most basic metaphysical question: Reality is an illusion.

A personal answer to the question of existence

Reality is self-existent eternal. Reality was created by something that is self-existent. So, which is the most plausible solution? So the possibility of reality being an illusion is eliminated. Next is the option of reality being self-created. The possibility of reality being self-created is one of those types of statements for the simple reason that something cannot be prior to itself.

If you created yourself, then you must have existed prior to you creating yourself, but that simply cannot be. Now we are left with only two choices—an eternal reality or reality being created by something that is eternal: The 18th-century theologian Jonathan Edwards summed up this crossroads: But the question now is, where does the evidence lead?

Does the evidence point to matter before mind or mind before matter? To date, all key scientific and philosophical evidence points away from an eternal universe and toward an eternal Creator. From a scientific standpoint, honest scientists admit the universe had a beginning, and whatever has a beginning is not eternal.

In other words, whatever has a beginning has a cause, and if the universe had a beginning, it had a cause.

Your Answer

All prove the universe is not eternal. Further, the laws that surround causation speak against the universe being the ultimate cause of all we know for this simple fact: This being true, no atheist can explain how an impersonal, purposeless, meaningless, and amoral universe accidentally created beings us who are full of personality and obsessed with purpose, meaning, and morals.

Such a thing, from a causation standpoint, completely refutes the idea of a natural universe birthing everything that exists. So in the end, the concept of an eternal universe is eliminated. Mill not a Christian summed up where we have now come to: Or to put it in a logical set of statements: Can we infer things about Him from what He created?

In other words, can we understand the cause by its effects? The answer to this is yes, we can, with the following characteristics being surmised: Only cognitive being can produce cognitive being.

These things being true, we now ask if any religion in the world describes such a Creator. The answer to this is yes: He is supernatural Genesis 1: The former only needs to find a single red eagle to prove his assertion.

But the latter must comb the entire universe and literally be in every place at once to ensure he has not missed a red eagle somewhere and at some time, which is impossible to do.

This is why intellectually honest atheists will admit they cannot prove God does not exist.Does God Exist Can Philosophy Prove the Existence of God? Every culture has had its gods. The ancient agrarian cultures had their fertility gods; the Greeks and Romans had their pantheon; Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have their one god of all.

Question: "Is there an argument for the existence of God?" Answer: The question of whether there is a conclusive argument for the existence of God has been debated throughout history, with exceedingly intelligent people taking both sides of the dispute. In recent times, arguments against the possibility of God’s existence have taken on a militant spirit that accuses anyone daring to believe.

Questions about the meaning of life have also seen radical changes, from attempts to reevaluate human existence in biological and scientific terms (as in pragmatism and logical positivism) to efforts to meta-theorize about meaning-making as a personal, individual .

ph-vs.com: How to Live: Or A Life of Montaigne in One Question and Twenty Attempts at an Answer (): Sarah Bakewell: Books. A personal example of "riddle of existence" that caused you to question of the existence of God.

I guess I am not sure exactly what the riddle of existence is, so I am having troubles coming up with an example. Ad Hominem (Argument To The Man): attacking the person instead of attacking his argument.

For example, "Von Daniken's books about ancient astronauts .

The Last Question - Wikipedia